Appeals Court Orders Retrial Of Shah Alam MP Defamation Suit
PUTRAJAYA, Feb 27 – The Court of Appeal today set aside the High Court’s order that Datuk Dr Hassan Mohamed Ali pay RM200,000 in damages to Shah Alam member of Parliament Khalid Abdul Samad for defamation.
A three-man bench comprising Justices Datuk Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Datuk Mary Lim Thiam Suan and Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof allowed Hassan’s appeal for the case to be remitted back to the High Court for a retrial before another High Court judge.
In her decision, Tengku Maimun allowed Hassan’s appeal to reinstate his statement of defence which was struck out by the High Court on Dec 16, 2016. She also allowed his appeal to set aside the High Court’s decision in ordering him to pay RM200,000 in damages to Khalid.
Tengku Maimun set March 6 for the matter to be mentioned in the High Court. On Jan 25, last year, the High Court allowed Khalid’s lawsuit and ordered Hassan to pay him (Khalid) RM200,000 in damages for defaming him regarding the sale of liquor, gaming centres and massage parlours in Selangor.
Khalid, now Parti Amanah Negara (Amanah) committee member sued Hassan, who was then a Selangor State Government executive councillor alleging that he (Hassan) had uttered defamatory words in his speech at Dewan Rukun Tetangga hall, Seksyen 17, Shah Alam in 2012.
He claimed a video containing the speech was edited and uploaded to the YouTube social media site that could be accessed openly by the public and that the words allegedly uttered by Hassan was unfounded, not true and slanderous which affected his reputation, image and good name when he was then the PAS Central Committee member.
Hassan who was former Selangor Pas commissioner in his statement of defence, claimed the words that he said was a common phenomenon in the political scenario in Malaysia, namely the parties criticising each other for the sake of their own political interests.
On Dec 16, 2016, the High Court struck out Hassan’s statement of defence after finding that he failed to comply with the filing instructions for trial. After the verdict, Khalid’s counsel Muhammad Faiz Fadzil told reporters that the trial had proceeded without Hassan’s defence being considered. Lawyer Datuk Hasnal Rezua Merican represented Hassan. — Bernama
You may be interested
1,200 Marketers Converge On Hong Kong’s Inaugural MarketingPulsePocket News - March 22, 2018
HONG KONG, Mar 22 - MarketingPulse, Asia's premier conference and rendez-vous for marketers and brands, launched with a debut edition…
Govt To Continue With GST Due To Its Proven EfficiencyPocket News - March 22, 2018
PUTRAJAYA, Mar 22 - The Barisan Nasional government will stick to the goods and services tax (GST) since the tax system…
OTT Summit – Day 1: Addressing The “Perfect Storm”Pocket News - March 22, 2018
SINGAPORE, Mar 22 - Asian video industry association, Casbaa, held its annual OTT Summit, Asia's OTT industry marquee event, on…